Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Live Life Not Behind Glass's avatar

The greek word for “mark” used by St John is “χάραγμα” or transliterated, “charagma”. The oldest use we have of it is from a play by sophocles where it was referring to a mark left by a poisonous snake’s bite. I don’t pretend to know what exactly the mark is or will be, but the imagery in this is pretty interesting. A mark left by the fangs of a serpent. Fangs which act like hypodermic needles. In the lab we use luciferase sequence inserts and some sort of luciferin substrate or insert to see whether and where gene sequences we try to insert into test organisms are expressed, because luciferase makes the luciferin glow. If one were to express this in someone’s blood, it would be most reliably detectable in blood vessels in the hand or forehead. You could also make it give off wavelengths of light not visible to the naked eye, or so that it only is expressed in the presence of something else, or to some degree whatever you want really. The name sounds ominous but it isnt inherently a problem, but I recall seeing reports of people showing their hand veins glowing after certain medical interventions popular 4 years ago, and also people getting caught at US-UK and US-Canadian border checkpoints with fraudulent immunization papers, despite them having been issued by doctors who just didnt administer the shot, but which otherwise looked legitimate. Idk if any of this is useful, but these are things I haven’t forgotten. Daniel prophesies a time when the wise among the people, those who lead others, will be blinded and tricked so that they can be humbled, to prepare them for the greater trial to come after, and I cannot explain what happened recently in any other way. As a biologist myself, much of what was done made no sense to me from a biological or medical perspective, and a lot of it was, at best, freshman or sophomore level stuff that any undergraduate should have questioned, much less doctors and health ministers and whatever. I watched many of my peers and my betters, people very close to me, do, say, and believe things which I never would have thought they would have bought into beforehand, to such a degree that it was very dangerous for my relationships and career to even raise a question about, much less try to correct them.

Those sequencing machines you linked are pretty cool, but they arent really that useful on a super broad, society wide scale for scanning population-sized amounts of people. Short sequences though? At 400 bases a second that could be quite feasible. I suspect that for an application like what youre talking about it would be for detecting some sort of alteration or addition, that is relatively short, and fairly isolatable. It still seems impractical as a first line verification device, maybe to confirm something so they don’t get false positives or negatives? Wouldnt want to punish someone who had actually taken the mark, after all…

Yeowoman's avatar

So you think this kind of research can be accurate ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96agf03xZ3E

15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?